It is now clear that when Keir Starmer in opposition said “we choose the builders, not the blockers” he was talking only about house-building. Major shovel-ready infrastructure projects ready to boost the economy are either being scrapped or kept in the starting gates.
Starmer’s Labour Party was voted into power on 4th July this year and before the end of the month the £2.5bn A303 Stonehenge tunnel and the £350 A27 Arundel bypass had been scrapped.
Now we have confirmation that the government is wobbly on the biggest road building project in the programme, the £9bn Lower Thames Crossing scheme.
The decision on the application by National Highways under the Planning Act 2008 for the A122 Lower Thames Crossing development consent order was due on Friday 4th October. On Monday 7th October transport secretary Lousie Haigh confirmed press reports that she was not yet ready to make a call on the controversial project.
She has extended her deadline for making a decision to 23rd May 2025.
The previous government had already extended the deadline for a decision by three months once, to push it back to after the general election.
Now Haigh says she is parking it until next May because she wants more time to decide.
In a written statement, Haigh said: “Under section 107(1) of the Planning Act 2008, a decision on an application must be made within 3 months of receipt of the examining authority’s report, unless the power, under section 107(3), is exercised to extend the deadline, and a written ministerial statement is made to Parliament announcing the new deadline.
“The examining authority’s report on the Lower Thames Crossing development consent order was received on 20th March 2024. The current deadline for a decision is 4th October 2024, having been extended from 20th June 2024 by way of a written ministerial statement, dated 24th May 2024.
“The deadline for the decision is to be further extended to 23rd May 2025 in order to allow more time for the application to be considered further, including any decisions made as part of the spending review.
“The decision to set a new deadline is without prejudice to the decision on whether to grant the application development consent.”
